Language

English is used as the official language for these conferences and publications. Consequently, the document must be written in English, which means it must be clear and error-free.

Our Review Process

The Program Chair will evaluate each of the papers that were successfully submitted and start the peer review process. At least two qualified technical committee members (Reviewers) with extensive subject-matter expertise will thereafter be chosen by the program chair. Following a comprehensive evaluation, the program chair staff will get the comments and decide whether or not to submit the paper.

Finally, the conference secretary will communicate the decision to the involved authors. Papers that pass the second review will be approved, while those that are rejected will be returned for correction.

Note: Please check your email regularly during the review process.

Academic Ethics

Papers, abstracts, and other submissions must be unique, unpublished works that aren’t being considered for publication anywhere else. Academicians are also asked to contribute innovative, experimental, or theoretical work that adheres to the correct citation guidelines.
Any academic’s cornerstone is adherence to academic ethics. As a result, plagiarism is found the paper will be rejected and not accepted.

Plagiarism can take many forms, some of which include:

• The essay being rejected or taken out of the final publishing.
• Notifying the relevant institution or institutions and the author’s supervisor or supervisors of the problem.
• The right to disclose the identity or names of the authors, the article’s title, the name or names of the associated institution, and the specifics of the plagiarist’s wrongdoing, among other things.”